Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 DislikesPoisonTheWell, BudgetPlan1 liked this post
In general, that would be my thought as well but given a more extreme example, is it possible that a particular coatings` formulation is more or less resistant to individual climate conditions? Say coating `A` had a makeup that was more resistant to extreme UV conditions like in Phoenix AZ but afforded less protection to things like non-UV related environmentally abusive conditions and coating `B` which had greater chemical resistance but lesser UV protection, something that would do better sitting under acid rain in another area that did not have nuclear sunshine?
Too many variables to definitively come to consistent conclusions.
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 DislikesCoatings=crack, sixsix liked this post
Me too, i was turned off from all that....., whatever it was.
I think most know Pan is more bias then most youtubers, it was no secret. I still don`t know what the point of it all was. Destroy pan i guess, he has never sold me anything. After the video with him at TW i was out. lol I don`t need any protection from scottHD or urdog or something, people make their own choices on what to buy or not. I would never buy anything from undrdog personally.
Scott used a lot of products i never even heard of, not that its bad.
Pan lost me at Bead Maker as I did not has the exuberance as him. My beef was Pan list on all his video that it is a paid endorsement when it is.
When someone sent him the Nova Lustre and Jet to try he admitted that and gave them credit. I watch his videos as i would a commercial.
What Scott did was out him for getting paid which we all already knew if you paid attention to his video like pan or not he was honest.
For UndrDog and Scott to leak his financials pointless and just trying to start drama to increase views I feel. Bad form.
Dont really watch either anymore....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 Dislikesnoorth, BudgetPlan1 liked this post
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 DislikesCoatings=crack liked this post
I like his videos. Maybe people with more experience can poke holes in his reviews, but as I see it, he treats every product the same. His process is simple and repeatable, and you really can`t ask for more in a test.
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 Dislikes
While the comparison`s hold little interest for me he did do a neat vid on PPF and how it conceals less than perfect paint.
https://youtu.be/GrtxwxsRVuw
Pan Jealousy?...lol I`m glad ScottHD called him out on his dishonest reviews.
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 Dislikesroscopervis liked this post
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 Dislikesroscopervis liked this post
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 DislikesCadfael, BudgetPlan1 liked this post
Could we not turn this into a Pan vs Scott thread. Nobody cares anymore about this. This defeats the purpose for this thread.
Competition Ready Team 1929 Bentley
1999 Silvermist Metallic Pontiac Grand Prix GT
2002 Arctic White Chevy Camaro SSPost Thanks / Like - 3 Likes, 1 Thanks, 0 DislikesCadfael thanked for this post
Im not for either.... both have faults...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree. You get what you see. Back on topic. Sorry to hijack there folks, i actually always liked scotthd tests. Real world probably not but you get some interesting info and he definitely puts way more effort into it then i would.. lol He`s obviously not lazy like me haha Takes a lot of work i would say for what he is doing.
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes, 0 Thanks, 0 DislikesBudgetPlan1, Coatings=crack liked this post
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks