handporn.net
M95 Vs. M105 (Again) - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38
  1. #16

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    1,920
    Post Thanks / Like
    Well, while there is that option of M95 for the longer work-in time but if you have OC, wouldn`t it be more thrifty to just use a Scottwax`s M105/OC 70/30 mixture for the desired behavior?



    I know, I know, this thread`s about M95 vs. M105. But hey, if you can get by with the mixture, might as well use it!



    I guess I just need a much more justifiable reason to purchasing yet another bottle of polish.



    Oh and Supe, I think you need a UPW.
    Devil Pad

    Professional Automotive Detailing

  2. #17

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC (actually Iron Station, NC)
    Posts
    1,499
    Post Thanks / Like
    OK, so 95 has a longer working time, but 105 finishes nicer? If this is the case, couldn`t you just buy 105, and then mix a little Optimum Polishih, Optimum Compound, Clearkote Compound Moose, or Meguiar`s 83 to extend the play time of the 105?
    Ridding the world of swirls, one car at a time!

  3. #18
    SuperBee364's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,710
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by weekendwarrior
    OK, so 95 has a longer working time, but 105 finishes nicer? If this is the case, couldn`t you just buy 105, and then mix a little Optimum Polishih, Optimum Compound, Clearkote Compound Moose, or Meguiar`s 83 to extend the play time of the 105?


    Quote Originally Posted by Denzil
    Well, while there is that option of M95 for the longer work-in time but if you have OC, wouldn`t it be more thrifty to just use a Scottwax`s M105/OC 70/30 mixture for the desired behavior?



    I know, I know, this thread`s about M95 vs. M105. But hey, if you can get by with the mixture, might as well use it!



    I guess I just need a much more justifiable reason to purchasing yet another bottle of polish.



    Oh and Supe, I think you need a UPW.


    You`re a bad influence, Denzil. I like that.



    Yes, Scott`s idea of mixing in OC does work to extend the working time, but it also effects M105`s ability to finish off really well. Scott might have the trick to this, but I haven`t been able to get M105 to finish off nearly as well after adding OC to it. Maybe I should have used OP, but I didn`t want to diminish the cutting power of the 105. Otherwise, I`d just use SIP.
    Sage advice from Greg Nichols: "Hey, Supe? When you`re trying to get the air bubble out of your syringe of Opti-Coat, don`t point it at your face, mmmkay?"

  4. #19

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    1,920
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperBee364
    You`re a bad influence, Denzil. I like that.



    Yes, Scott`s idea of mixing in OC does work to extend the working time, but it also effects M105`s ability to finish off really well. Scott might have the trick to this, but I haven`t been able to get M105 to finish off nearly as well after adding OC to it. Maybe I should have used OP, but I didn`t want to diminish the cutting power of the 105. Otherwise, I`d just use SIP.


    Hey well, I think we just feed off of each other... so essentially, the cycle really never ends.



    It`s a good thing we haven`t sucked anyone else up into our vicious cycle, hehe.
    Devil Pad

    Professional Automotive Detailing

  5. #20
    Just a regular guy Todd@RUPES's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Oviedo/Stuart Florida
    Posts
    15,278
    Post Thanks / Like
    In my opinion after recentely using M95 on quite a few cars, I would choose M105.



    In comparision to each other...



    M105 has more cut then M95, in terms of defect removal after an application. M105 also breaks down in 5-20 seconds a wool pad, where as M95 has a more traditional working time (much wetter) and breaks down in 30 seconds or more. The cut difference is small enough, but M105 is definetly more aggressive and does the job much quicker.



    For the amount of cut M95 has (it has a lot, just not quite M105 amount) it does finish down pretty nice, but nowhere near as nice as M105 (when worked properly and quickly).



    M105 is much more finicky and sometimes is just a pain in the butt to use. It can smear, gum up, be stubborn to remove basically when ever it wants to. M95 by comparision is much more user friendly.



    If you could only have 1, then M95 might be the better choice because it has consistant results, where as M105 can act horribly on certain cars. However, when M105 is on, nothing touches it, not even M95 IMO.

  6. #21
    JAFO Junebug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,198
    Post Thanks / Like
    I`m one of the few that tried 105 and didn`t get the learning curve right. I`ll freely admit I have have a lot of "quit" in me (borrowed that from Ron White) and if it ain`t user friendly I give the hell up. That said, I believe I would be better off with 84 or 85 and just work it a little longer if I were chosing a Megs product. All ya`ll that get M105, my hat is off to you, salute!

  7. #22
    Lotus Exige S Rob Tomlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    2,382
    Post Thanks / Like
    Hmmm....



    So for a rotary newbie, would you recommend m95 over 105 Todd?

  8. #23
    SuperBee364's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,710
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by TH0001
    In my opinion after recentely using M95 on quite a few cars, I would choose M105.



    In comparision to each other...



    M105 has more cut then M95, in terms of defect removal after an application. M105 also breaks down in 5-20 seconds a wool pad, where as M95 has a more traditional working time (much wetter) and breaks down in 30 seconds or more. The cut difference is small enough, but M105 is definetly more aggressive and does the job much quicker.



    For the amount of cut M95 has (it has a lot, just not quite M105 amount) it does finish down pretty nice, but nowhere near as nice as M105 (when worked properly and quickly).



    M105 is much more finicky and sometimes is just a pain in the butt to use. It can smear, gum up, be stubborn to remove basically when ever it wants to. M95 by comparision is much more user friendly.



    If you could only have 1, then M95 might be the better choice because it has consistant results, where as M105 can act horribly on certain cars. However, when M105 is on, nothing touches it, not even M95 IMO.


    This is exactly the stuff I`m looking for. Thank you very much, Todd.



    I`m glad to hear that even you pros experience the odd problem with 105. I was thinking it was just me. It probably *is* me, but still it`s nice to know that others find it finicky too.
    Sage advice from Greg Nichols: "Hey, Supe? When you`re trying to get the air bubble out of your syringe of Opti-Coat, don`t point it at your face, mmmkay?"

  9. #24
    SuperBee364's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,710
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Tomlin
    Hmmm....



    So for a rotary newbie, would you recommend m95 over 105 Todd?


    I know you asked Todd specifically, but I just gotta add my two cents on this one...



    Rob, since you`re new to the rotary, you won`t have been pre-trained on other polishes. That`s a good thing, cause with M105 you have to pretty much un-learn everything you`ve learned about polishing and start over completely.



    Even with as much cutting power as M105 has, Meguairs has added some safe guards to it. You simply can`t work it very long, it won`t let you. That being the case, it`s actually a pretty new-guy safe compound. Just don`t do a bunch of repeated applications on the same area, and you should be ok.



    If you don`t like the way an M105 polished area came out, just hit it with SIP or 106 to remove the haze/swirls, etc. But don`t do another application of the 105.
    Sage advice from Greg Nichols: "Hey, Supe? When you`re trying to get the air bubble out of your syringe of Opti-Coat, don`t point it at your face, mmmkay?"

  10. #25
    Lotus Exige S Rob Tomlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    2,382
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperBee364
    I know you asked Todd specifically, but I just gotta add my two cents on this one...



    Rob, since you`re new to the rotary, you won`t have been pre-trained on other polishes. That`s a good thing, cause with M105 you have to pretty much un-learn everything you`ve learned about polishing and start over completely.



    Even with as much cutting power as M105 has, Meguairs has added some safe guards to it. You simply can`t work it very long, it won`t let you. That being the case, it`s actually a pretty new-guy safe compound. Just don`t do a bunch of repeated applications on the same area, and you should be ok.



    If you don`t like the way an M105 polished area came out, just hit it with SIP or 106 to remove the haze/swirls, etc. But don`t do another application of the 105.


    Thanks for that, makes a lot of sense!



    For a car that has some fairly bad swirls, but is otherwise in pretty good condition (no or few RIDS etc) what pad would you start out with? PFW?

  11. #26
    SuperBee364's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,710
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Tomlin
    Thanks for that, makes a lot of sense!



    For a car that has some fairly bad swirls, but is otherwise in pretty good condition (no or few RIDS etc) what pad would you start out with? PFW?


    PFW works really well with M105, as long as you keep the pad slightly moistened with a good QD. Otherwise it gums up really fast. Spurring between each application helps alot, too.



    You`re gonna love this stuff.
    Sage advice from Greg Nichols: "Hey, Supe? When you`re trying to get the air bubble out of your syringe of Opti-Coat, don`t point it at your face, mmmkay?"

  12. #27
    Lotus Exige S Rob Tomlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    2,382
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperBee364
    PFW works really well with M105, as long as you keep the pad slightly moistened with a good QD. Otherwise it gums up really fast. Spurring between each application helps alot, too.



    You`re gonna love this stuff.


    You cost me some dough today pal!



    Just ordered m105, 3 PFW pads (I already had two, but that`s just not enough) and the spur from ADS! The 105 is only $23.95 for 32 ounces, not a bad price. And the 3 pack of PFW was $29.95, which is about $10 each.







    Edit: may be getting the 105 locally to insure I will have it this weekend.

  13. #28
    SuperBee364's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,710
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Rob Tomlin
    You cost me some dough today pal!



    Just ordered m105, 3 PFW pads (I already had two, but that`s just not enough) and the spur from ADS! The 105 is only $23.95 for 32 ounces, not a bad price. And the 3 pack of PFW was $29.95, which is about $10 each.





    LoL, it`s never quite enough, is it? I`m thinking about ordering some M95 and Black Wow from ADS. Ya know, we should really be blaming Denzil. He`s the one that suggested ADS to me a couple months ago. Although I gotta say, I`ve been very happy with ADS so far. Their prices are usually among the best, and getting my stuff two days after ordering is nice, too.
    Sage advice from Greg Nichols: "Hey, Supe? When you`re trying to get the air bubble out of your syringe of Opti-Coat, don`t point it at your face, mmmkay?"

  14. #29

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    1,920
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperBee364
    LoL, it`s never quite enough, is it? I`m thinking about ordering some M95 and Black Wow from ADS. Ya know, we should really be blaming Denzil. He`s the one that suggested ADS to me a couple months ago. Although I gotta say, I`ve been very happy with ADS so far. Their prices are usually among the best, and getting my stuff two days after ordering is nice, too.


    LoL, I`m just as guilty as you guys are about spending money! Hell, I blame myself for impulsively buying detailing products all the time because somehow, some way, I find a "justifying" reason to have it. It`s an addiction.



    I might have to start going to Detailers Anonymous meetings... :laugh:



    So about those meetings... Patrick at Excel Detail should be getting another order from me tomorrow. :woot2:
    Devil Pad

    Professional Automotive Detailing

  15. #30

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    2,060
    Post Thanks / Like
    rick at ads is great. I do wish shipping was cheaper but that is not his fault.

�

�
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Similar Threads

    1. M105 vs M95
      By Toymachine2009 in forum Car Detailing Product Discussion
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: 10-09-2010, 11:58 AM
    2. M105 & Fp Compared To M105 & M205
      By EMIN007 in forum Car Detailing Product Discussion
      Replies: 13
      Last Post: 09-25-2009, 11:17 AM
    3. M105 & fp compared to m105 & m205
      By EMIN007 in forum Detailing Product Reviews
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: 09-22-2009, 03:19 PM
    4. m105 help
      By sicilykid91 in forum Car Detailing
      Replies: 9
      Last Post: 05-15-2009, 08:21 AM
    5. Where can I buy M105?
      By clnfrk in forum Car Detailing Product Discussion
      Replies: 18
      Last Post: 07-04-2008, 04:10 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    • �